Alternative title: People who care about other people are actually assholes, just less self-centered assholes

Premise 1: All genes seek reproduction.

Premise 2: Our emotions are an expression of our genes.

Lemma 1, based on premise 1 and premise 2: Our emotions facilitate reproduction of genetic data.

Premise 3: Humans share many genes.

Contention 1, based on Premise 3 and Lemma 1: Genes in person A can reproduce by helping the reproduction of person B (as long as the damage to the reproductive success to person A is low enough, e.g. person B is of the opposite gender and is not a competitor to reproduction).

Premise 4: The more similar the appearance of person A is to person B, the more similar are their genes.

Contention 2, based on Premise 4 and Contention 1: Humans will tend to be more compassionate toward people similar to themselves.

Corollary 1 to Contention 1: Compassion and empathy are, like all other emotions, selfish emotions from a genetic perspective.

Discussion: Acts of generosity and compassion are actually genetically selfish behavior. A person sees himself in another person. Genes identify similar genes and control human behavior so as to assist the survival of similar genetic data.

People usually judge behavior in terms of good and bad, moral and immoral. From red-pill perspective we see only attempts, rational or irrational, effective or ineffective, for genetic reproduction.  It may leave a feeling of huge emptiness, a gaping abyss, but it is the nature of the red-pill. It is the emotional price you must pay for the ability to think outside of the genetically induced matrix of human emotions and social morality. To think outside of yourself.

I attach here a link to the current version of the Guide for a Young Patriarch. There is still much to be added and I will write more as time permits.

Dicipres

Preliminary note: Women’s ovulation is concealed, i.e. there are no distinctive signals that a woman is near ovulation. Such concealed ovulation is highly uncommon in nature and characterizes only humans and a few other species. More information on concealed ovulation can be found in Gangestad & Thornhill (2008).

Premise 1: All genes seek reproduction.

Premise 2: Our biology is a manifestation of genetic data.

Lemma 1, based on Premise 1 and Premise 2: Human biology exists to maximize successful reproduction.

Premise 4: Women have concealed ovulation, i.e. their biology conceals information regarding their sexuality and fertility.

Contention 1 from Lemma 1 and Premise 4: Women reproduction success benefits from hiding information regarding their own sexuality.

Corollary 1 to Contention 1: If there is an evolutionary advantage for women to conceal their sexual nature it must have affected more than just the biology of concealed ovulation. Hence, women’s psychology and behavior had evolutionary pressure to conceal sexual information.

Corollary 2 to Contention 1: Biology evolved so that women themselves are not aware of their own ovulation. Hence, lack of self-awareness of their own sexual nature gave women reproductive advantage. Therefore, women’s psychology and behavior had evolutionary pressure to reduce women’s awareness of their own sexuality (extensive support for this claim can be found in Chivers, et al. 2010).

Corollary 3 to Contention 1: Women’s sexual mystery is a deliberate attempt by nature to obtain reproductive advantage.

Corollary 4 to Contention 1: Don’t listen to women on the subject of female attraction. They don’t understand it (unless they are red-pill).

Corollary 5 to Contention 1: Women can’t teach their sons how to interact with women (unless they are red-pill).

Discussion: There are several theories to as why women choose to hide sexual information. These theories range from cuckolding technique, keeping the man close as much as possible, and other hypotheses. In any case, the existence of concealed ovulation strongly suggests hiding information from others and themselves yielded a reproductive advantage for women.

It is hard to understand women’s sexual behavior for a reason: their biology and psychology deliberately don’t want you (or her) to understand it, since such understanding will give you true power over a woman

References
Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. (2008) Human oestrus Proc Biol Sci. 275(1638):991-1000.
Chivers ML, Seto MC, Lalumière ML, Laan E, Grimbos (2010) “Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: a meta-analysis,“ T. Arch Sex Behav. 39(1):5-56.

(This post is based on the ‘Guide to the Young Patriarch.’ The current draft of the Guide can be found here.)

A reader by the handle of Snoosh made a visual representation of the structure of the argument made in “Femininity is Masochistic, Masculinity is Sadistic.” The diagram clearly presents the ideas of that post and I attach it here for the benefit of the readers.

Many of the liberal/feminist/humanists/socialists currently neutering the heritage of the west are Jews. Much more than their proportion in the population. However, if you think this is a Jewish conspiracy for the Jewish culture to rule the world… look at the above video.

The chickens are coming home to roost. The cultural, tribal and coming-of-age meaning of the Bar-Mitzva ceremony is reduced to a Sweet-Sixteen-type self-promotion Bonobo-Monkey public Masturbation. The kid probably don’t even know what he did wrong (well, except the ‘singing’). This is a spit in the face of the old traditions, a true defamation of the Jewish religion (yet I doubt that the ADL would have any comments to make), a deep rot.

Kid, if you are somehow reading this, I don’t blame you. You are just a product of your environment. I blame your parents.

Premise 1: Religions are effective in controlling human emotions and behavior.

Premise 2: One of the principal tools used widely by religions is the prayer, which is required in virtually all religions (sometimes up to five times a day).

Contention 1, based on premise 1 and premise 2: Prayer is an effective tool to control emotions and behavior.

Corollary 1 to Contention 1: Personal, self-designed prayers (as well as other tools used by religions and states) can be used your advantage in order to control and change your emotions and behavior.

Guide for a Young Patriarch.

The progress is very slow, due to personal lack of time and the way I chose to write the guide. Only about 20% of the original guide were revised so far, but I believe the quality and clarity is now much improved. I appreciate the comments made on this work as they helped to improve it.

Dici Pres

Alternative title:  Why you should be an asshole and treat women like crap

“I am afraid that women appreciate cruelty, downright cruelty, more than anything else. They have wonderfully primitive instincts. We have emancipated them, but they remain slaves looking for their masters all the same,” Oscar Wilde.

Premise 1: All genes seek reproduction.

Premise 2: Our emotions are an expression of our genes.

Lemma 1, based on premise 1 and premise 2: Our emotions are constructed so as to facilitate reproduction of genetic material.

Premise 3: Sex is biologically cheap for men, compared with women (e.g. pregnancy, childbirth and breast-feeding vs. sperm).

Lemma 2 based on premise 3 and premise 1: Sex is a better biological deal for men compared with women.

Corollary 1 to Lemma 2: Men will prioritize quantity of lovers (more good deals, sperm is cheap) while women will prioritize the quality of their lovers (get best deal for the high price paid for sex).

Corollary 2 to Lemma 2: It is of more importance for women, compared with men, to acquire the male genetic data with the best possible chance of reproduction.

Premise 4: Men who dominated and exploited women reproduced better, compared with men that did not dominated and exploited women.

Contention 1, based on corollary 2 to lemma 2 and premise 4: Women will tend to be sexually attracted to men who exploit and dominate them.

Corollary 1 to Contention 1: Women are sexually repulsed from men they can exploit and dominate.

Corollary 2 to Contention 1: A woman in a power position over a man will tend to be sexually repulsed by him.

Corollary 3 to Contention 1:  Women sexuality is fulfilled when she is weak within her relationship.

While this is a great book, this is not the FULL Aurini philosophy book since many of the ideas and views present in Aurini’s clips are absent or shorten in this book. I do hope Aurini will write a pure philosophy book in the future, since my interests are not how good of a writer he is, but in the ideas he present.

In any case, it is a highly recommended reading. I enjoyed this book tremendously it is a must reading to any student of the red-pill.

An interesting ScienceDaily article “The Maternal Effect: How Mother Deer Protect Their Future Kings” nicely presents the concept of  ”alpha” male > female > “beta” male. (Here I define an alpha male as a male with high chances to reproduce and a beta male a male with low chances to reproduce.)

This also suggests that the concept of alpha female or beta female is somewhat flawed. If an “Alpha Female” did exist, she would have got the similar preferential treatment the “Alpha Male” got. While females do have status differences, their chances to reproduce are limited by their biology and supported by their access to sex. Hence, female variance in reproductive success is much smaller than males, and the difference between “alpha female” and “beta female” is much smaller than the difference between the “alpha male” and the “beta male”.

While we always need to be careful applying animal research to humans, the researcher notes in the article that “For those unconcerned about deer or elk, this research can be a reminder that similar research exists for humans.”

In conclusion, men’s value can soar high or crash down, according to their status, while women are safely in the middle.