Comparison to animals is always problematic, but this can be said to almost any other method of social analysis and the data in the figure below do make sense to me. Look at the following comparison of mating habits of three social mammals:
I draw from this illustration the following conclusion: If one gender need to be more dominant in order to reproduce (compared with the other gender), it will be the dominant gender. Hence, men’s dominance is just a byproduct of harsher men’s reproductive competition compared to women. Since 80% of women ever lived managed to reproduced compared with only 40% of men, humans are more like lions, compared with wolfs or hyenas.
Lets take another look at the figure I posted in my previous entry
You can see that sexually regulated “Perfect dad society” has similar reproductive challenges for men and women, and we thus expect that, if these social sexual regulations will remain for sufficient amount of time, an egalitarian society will be created. However, thanks to the sex-positive feminism and its me-me-me individualism as religion allies, we are reverting to cad society which will also sustain the current and even create more gender “inequality” (differences between men and women and more dominant men). Not that I care about that. I prefer dad society only because I believe it will be a better place for my children to live in. I love being a father and want my son to be able to experience fatherhood as well, instead of the modern Cad focused on fucking sluts in short term bonds and paying child support to children he (maybe) get to see only with court order twice a month.
Another, more cheerful conclusion is that feminism contains the seeds for its own destruction.